SCOTT C. LUNDQUIST

RECORD OF TESTIMONY AND EXPERT WITNESS APPEARANCES

Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, Re: In the Matter of the Review of: Unbundled Loop and Switching Rates; the Deaveraged Zone Rate Structure; and Unbundled Network Elements, Transport, and Termination (Recurring Costs), Docket No. UT-023003, on behalf of AT&T Communications of the Pacific Northwest, Inc., Responsive Testimony filed April 20, 200, cross-examination May 28, 2004.

Vermont Public Service Board, in Re: Investigation Into The Acquisition and Use of Central Office Codes by Local Exchange Carriers in Vermont, Docket No 6209, filed on behalf of Global NAPs, Inc., Affidavit filed October 17, 2002.

District of Columbia Public Service Commission, in Re: In the Matter of Review by the Commission Into Verizon DC’s Compliance with the Conditions of 47 U.S.C. §271(c), Formal Case No. 1011, on behalf of the Office of People’s Counsel of the District of Columbia, Affidavit filed September 30, 2002, cross-examination waived.

Delaware Public Service Commission, in Re: Global NAPs, Inc. Petition for Arbitration Pursuant to Section 252(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Establish an Interconnection Agreement with Verizon Delaware Inc. f/k/a Bell Atlantic-Delaware, Inc., Docket No. 02-235, on behalf of Global NAPs, Inc., Direct Testimony filed on September 18, 2002, Rebuttal Testimony filed October 2, 2002, cross-examination November 4, 2002.

Vermont Public Service Board, in Re: Global NAPs, Inc. Petition For Arbitration Pursuant to Section 252(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Establish an Interconnection Agreement with Verizon New England, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Vermont, Inc. f/k/a New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. d/b/a Bell Atlantic - Vermont, Docket No. 6742 on behalf of Global NAPs, Inc., Direct Testimony filed September 11, 2002, Rebuttal Testimony filed October 7, 2002, cross-examination October 25, 2002.

Rhode Island and Providence Plantations Public Utilities Commission, in Re: Global NAPs, Inc. Petition for Arbitration Pursuant to Section 252(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Establish and Interconnection Agreement with Verizon New England, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Rhode Island, Inc. f/k/a New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. d/b/a Bell Atlantic - Rhode Island, Docket No. 3437 on behalf of Global NAPs, Inc., Direct Testimony filed August 28, 2002, Rebuttal Testimony filed September 6, 2002, cross-examination September 26, 2002.

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, Office of Administrative Hearings, in Re: In the Matter of a Commission Investigation into Qwest’s Compliance with Section 271(c)(2)(B) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Checklist Items 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 11, 13, and 14, PUC Docket No. P-421/CI-01-1371, on behalf of the Minnesota Department of Commerce, Affidavit filed June 10, 2002, cross-examination September 9, 2002.

Wisconsin Public Service Commission, in Re: Application of CenturyTel of Central Wisconsin, LLC, as a Telecommunications Utility, for Authority to Establish Permanent Telephone Rates, Docket No. 2055-TR-102; Application of Telephone USA of Wisconsin, LLC, as a Telecommunications Utility, for Authority to Establish Permanent Telephone Rates, Docket No. 5846-TR-102, on behalf of AT&T Communications of Wisconsin, L.P., Direct Testimony filed May 31, 2002, Rebuttal Testimony filed June 21, 2002, cross-examination June 26, 2002.

Ohio Public Utilities Commission, in Re: In the Matter of Global NAPs, Inc. Petition for Arbitration Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §252(b) of Interconnection Rates, Terms and Conditions with Verizon North Inc. f/k/a GTE North, Case No. 02-876-TP-ARB, Direct Testimony filed May 30, 2002, cross-examination June 6, 2002.

Illinois Commerce Commission, in Re: Global NAPs Illinois, Inc. Petition for Arbitration Pursuant to Section 252(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Establish an Interconnection Agreement with Verizon North Inc. f/ka/ GTE North Incorporates and Verizon South Inc. f/k/a GTE South Incorporated, Docket No. 02-0253, on behalf of Global NAPs, Inc., Direct Testimony filed May 16, 2002, Rebuttal Testimony filed June 4, 2002, cross-examination June 11, 2002.

North Carolina Utilities Commission, in Re: Global NAPs North Carolina, Inc. Petition for Arbitration Pursuant to Section 252(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Establish an Interconnection Agreement with Verizon South, Inc. f/ka/ GTE South Incorporated, Docket No. P-1141 Sub1, on behalf of Global NAPs, Inc., Direct Testimony filed April 19, 2002, Rebuttal filed May 24, 2002, cross-examination July 23, 2002.

Ohio Public Utilities Commission, in Re: Global NAPs, Inc. Petition for Arbitration Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 252(b) of Interconnection Rates, Terms and Conditions with Ohio Bell Telephone Company d/b/a Ameritech Ohio, Case No. 01-3096-TP-ARB; Global NAPs, Inc. Petition for Arbitration Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 252(b) of Interconnection Rates, Terms and Conditions with United Telephone Company of Ohio d/b/a Sprint, Case No. 01-2811-TP-ARB, on behalf of Global NAPs, Inc., Direct Testimony filed February 12, 2002, cross-examination February 19, 2002.

Minnesota State Office of Administrative Hearings for the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, in Re: Commission Investigation into Qwest’s Compliance with Section 271(c)(2)(B) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Checklist Items 3, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 12, PUC Docket No. P-421/CI-01-1370, OAH Docket No. X-2500-14485-2, on behalf of the Minnesota Department of Commerce, Affidavit filed January 28, 2002, cross-examination March 6, 2002.

Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C., In Re: Performance Measurements and Standards for Unbundled Network Elements and Interconnection, CC Docket No. 01-318; Performance Measurements and Reporting Requirements For Operations Support Systems, Interconnection, and Operator Services and Directory Assistance, CC Docket No. 98-56; Deployment of Wireless Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability, Docket No. 98-147; Petition of Association for Local Telecommunications Services for Declaratory Ruling, CC Docket Nos. 98-147, 98-141, on behalf of Focal Communications Corporation, Pac-West Telecomm, Inc., and US LEC Corp., Declaration filed January 21, 2002.

Illinois Commerce Commission, in Re: Petition of Global NAPs, Inc. for Arbitration Pursuant to Section 252(b) of The Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Establish an Interconnection Agreement with Illinois Bell Telephone Company d/b/a Ameritech Illinois, Docket No. 01-0786, on behalf of Global NAPs, Inc., Direct Testimony filed December 28, 2001, cross-examination waived.

California Public Utilities Commission in Re: Global NAPs, Inc. Petition for Arbitration of an Interconnection Agreement with Verizon California Inc. F/K/A GTE California, Inc. (U-6449-C) Pursuant to Section 252(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Application 01-12-026, on behalf of Global NAPs, Inc., Direct Testimony filed December 20, 2001, cross-examination, February 11, 2002.

Nevada Public Utilities Commission, in Re: Petition of Global NAPs, Inc. for the Arbitration of an Interconnection Agreement with Central Telephone Company - Nevada, d/b/a Sprint of Nevada, Pursuant to Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Docket No. 01-10018, on behalf of Global NAPs, Inc., Direct Testimony filed December 4, 2001, cross-examination waived.

California Public Utilities Commission in Re: Petition by GNAPS, Inc. for Arbitration of an Interconnection Agreement with Pacific Bell Telephone Company Pursuant to Section 252(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Application 01-11-045, on behalf of Global NAPs, Inc., Direct Testimony filed November 30, 2001, cross-examination February 11, 2002.

Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy, in Re: Complaint of Fiber Technologies Networks, LLC Pursuant to G.L.c.166 § 45.00 et seq. Regarding access to poles owned or controlled by Shrewsbury’s Electric Light Plant, DTE 01-70, on behalf of Fiber Technologies Networks, LLC, Direct Testimony filed November 9, 2001, no cross-examination conducted.

Maryland Public Service Commission, in Re: Investigation into Rates for Unbundled Network Elements Pursuant to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Case No. 8879, on behalf of the Maryland Office of People’s Counsel, Rebuttal Testimony filed September 5, 2001, Surrebuttal Testimony filed October 15, 2001, cross-examination December 7, 2001.

Wisconsin Public Service Commission, in Re: Application of CenturyTel of the Midwest-Kendall, Inc. for Rate Increase and Petition for Emergency Order for Rate Increase, Docket No. 2815-TR-103, on behalf of AT&T Communications of Wisconsin, L.P., Direct Testimony filed June 19, 2001, Rebuttal Testimony filed July 3, 2001, cross-examination waived.

New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, in Re: Review of Unbundled Network Elements Rates, Terms and Conditions of Bell Atlantic-New Jersey, Inc., Docket No. TO00060356, on behalf of the State of New Jersey, Division of the Ratepayer Advocate, Direct Testimony filed October 12, 2000, cross-examination January 26, 2001.

New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, in Re: Application of Bell Atlantic-New Jersey, Inc. for Approval of a Modified Plan for an Alternative Form of Regulation and to Reclassify All Rate Regulated Services as Competitive Services, Docket No. TO99120934, on behalf of the State of New Jersey, Division of the Ratepayer Advocate, Direct Testimony filed September 8, 2000, cross-examination waived.

Alabama Public Service Commission, in Re: Generic Proceeding: Costs and Rates of BellSouth's Operations Support System (OSS), Docket No. 27178, on behalf of National ALEC Association/Prepaid Communications Association, Direct Testimony filed May 20, 2000, cross-examination June 13, 2000.

California Public Utilities Commission, in Re: Petition by Pacific Bell (U 1001 C) for Arbitration of an Interconnection Agreement with Pac-West Telecom, Inc. (U 5266 C) Pursuant to Section 252(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Docket No. 98-11-024, on behalf of Pac West Telecom, Inc., Direct Testimony filed February 8, 1999, cross-examination February 24, 1999.

Texas Public Utilities Commission, in Re: Public Utility Commission, Application of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company for Rate Group Re-Classification Pursuant to Section 58.058 of the Texas Utility Code, Docket No. 18509, on behalf of the Office of Public Utility Counsel, Direct Testimony filed August 18, 1998, cross-examination September 9, 1998.

Hawaii Public Utilities Commission, in Re: Instituting a Proceeding on Communications, Including an Investigation of the Communications Infrastructure of the State of Hawaii, Docket No. 7702, on behalf of AT&T Communications of Hawaii, Inc., Rebuttal Testimony filed August 28, 1997, cross-examination October 17, 1997.

Nevada Public Service Commission, in Re: A Petition by the Regulatory Operations Staff to Open an Investigation into the Procedures and Methodologies that Should Be Used to Develop Costs for Bundled or Unbundled Telephone Services or Service Elements in the State of Nevada, Docket No. 96-9035, on behalf of AT&T Communications of Nevada, Direct Testimony filed May 9, 1997, Rebuttal Testimony filed May 23, 1997, cross-examination June 11, 1997.

Ohio Public Utilities Commission, in Re: Review of Ameritech Ohio's Economic Costs for Interconnection, Unbundled Network Elements, and Reciprocal Compensation for Transport and Termination of Local Telecommunications Traffic, Docket No. 96-922-TP-UNC, on behalf of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel, Direct Testimony filed January 17, 1997.

California Public Utilities Commission, in Re: Petition of AT&T Communications of California, Inc. for Arbitration Pursuant to Section 252 of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Establish an Interconnection Agreement with GTE California, Inc., Docket No. A.96-08-41, on behalf of AT&T of California, Inc., Oral testimony presented October 3, 1996.

Connecticut Public Utilities Commission, in Re: Application of SNET for Approval to Offer Unbundled Loops, Ports, and the Associated Interconnection Arrangements and Application of SNET for Approval to Offer Wholesale Local Basic Service and Certain Related Features and to Implement a Universal Service Fund, Docket No. 95-06-17, on behalf of New England Cable Television Association, Inc., Direct Testimony filed September 8, 1995.

Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, in Re: In the Matter of the Request of US West Communications, Inc. for the Increase in its Rates and Charges, Docket No. UT-950200, on behalf of Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission Staff, Direct Testimony filed August 11, 1995, cross-examination January 15, 1996.

Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, in Re: WUTC, Complainant vs. US West, Respondent; TGC Seattle and Digital Direct of Seattle, Inc., Complaint vs. US West, Respondent; TCG Seattle, Complainant v. GTE Northwest, Inc., Respondent; GTE Northwest, Inc., Third Party Complainant v. US West, Third Party Respondent; Electric Lightwave, Inc., Complaint v. GTE Northwest, Inc., Respondent, Docket No. UT-941464, et al, on behalf of Staff of the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, Direct Testimony filed April 17, 1995.

Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, in Re: Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, Complainant vs. US WEST Communications, Inc., Respondent; Application of US WEST Communications, Inc., for an Alternative Form of Regulation, Docket Nos. U-89-2698-F, U-89-3245-P, on behalf of TRACER, Direct Testimony filed June 23, 1993, cross-examination July 1, 1993.